Brunswick 


  • About Brunswick
  • Our expertise
  • Our people
  • Insights & Brunswick Review
  • Group companies
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Contact
  • Site map
  • Home

Insights & analysis

  • Feedback
  • Surveys
  • Talking Points
  • Reports
  • Brunswick Review Issue 6
  • Brunswick Review Issue 5
  • Brunswick Review Issue 4
  • Brunswick Review Issue 3
    • Contents
    • Features
      • Standing guard for standards
      • A calculated take on trust
      • Hearing China’s voices
      • Follow the leader
      • High Fidelity
      • Custodian of a Scandinavian icon
      • Analyzing the union
      • Blogging in Brussels
      • Mobilize everything
      • After the deal
      • The cultural world after the crunch
      • Anatomy of an announcement
      • Show then share
      • Socially responsible investing pays dividends
      • Greater than the sum of its parts
    • Research
      • Digital media and the investment community
      • Trust no one
    • Different take
      • Orchestral maneuvers
      • Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
      • Devil in the detail
      • Figures of trust
      • Critical moment
  • Brunswick Review Issue 2
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
      • Climate change contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Climate perspectives
      • Introduction
      • Let's lower the curtain on the high-carbon era
      • The role of progressive states and provinces
      • China's new green
      • 20/20 vision
      • A sustainable global economy
      • Norway's route to low emissions
      • Building work
      • Time to pay up for the ecological crisis
      • A movie... not a snapshot
      • Chemical reaction
      • The long & the short of it
      • Investors as stewards
        • Dealing with the damage
      • No short cuts, please
      • Policy and the investor
      • Time to recognise forest carbon
      • The new climate for business
      • Time for a new manhattan project*
      • A fashionable future
    • Conversation & comment
      • Mark Thompson
      • Arianna Huffington
      • John Kennedy
      • Wu Xiaobo
      • Oliver Michalsky
      • Rise of the global commentariat
      • Should CEOs Twitter?
      • Mobilizing 15 million voices
      • On/off annual reporting
      • Careful, it's on the record!
    • Features
      • Why circulation is irrelevant
      • Restructuring: building the best comms model
      • A guide to guidance
        • Guidance at Unilever
      • Communicating to public & private stakeholders
      • The governance of not for profits
      • Effective board engagement with shareholders
      • What makes a great corporate affairs director?
      • Gimme shelter? Or pump up the volume?
      • Reflections of a Latin American leader
      • EU Financial Services Regulation – Moving beyond the crisis
        • An EU regulatory perspective
      • The new lobbyists
      • Tackling Beijing's M&A block
    • Research
      • Are analysts and investors engaging with new media?
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • The ties that bind
        • Corporate tie etiquette
      • Poetry
      • Leading through literature
      • What we're editing
        • The new zero
        • International book award
    • The last laugh
  • Brunswick Review Issue 1
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Q&A feature
      • Milestones
    • The big debate
      • Editor’s introduction
      • 01: Stephen Green
      • 02: Sir Win Bischoff
      • 03: Anthony Bolton
      • 04: Glenn Greenburg & Joshua Slocum
      • 05: David Faber
      • 06: John Duncan
    • Features
      • Playing happy families
      • Is there a bigger role for business in South African society?
      • One chair, many roles
      • Dubai, the reputational challenge
      • Unsolicited offers enter the mainstream
      • M&A communications in a downturn
      • A cross-cultural communications challenge
        • Media
      • The missing link
        • Checklist
      • Washington, DC 2009: The new order
      • Hard times for corporate responsibility?
        • Environmental reporting
      • When should companies apologize?
    • Research
      • But what shall we tell the staff?
      • Comply or communicate?
        • Overview of results
      • A growing role for business to forge the CR agenda
        • A diverse agenda
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • Selling the Papacy
      • The dangers of corporate kissing
      • Diary of a talent hunt
      • Tough times, straight talking
      • What we have been reading
        • Life of a European Mandarin
        • Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life
    • The last laugh

Features

Add to download library
Add to print basket
Email this page
  • Go to download library
  • Go to print basket

Brunswick
Review
Issue three
Winter 2010

Infographics show and tell

Written by:
  • Michelangelo Bendandi, Brunswick, London

You know that a trend has been established when the parodies begin. On the opposite page you will find the Big Graphic Blueprint, created by Nathan Yau, which mocks the modern trend of supplying data in some sort of chart. Certainly infographics – presenting often complicated data in an illustrative way in order to attract attention and help understanding – are very trendy just now.But the process is not at all new.

Take for example the Nightingale Rose Graph, also shown opposite. It is named after its creator, Florence Nightingale, an English nurse who became famous during the Crimean War, when she looked after wounded soldiers. Nightingale was also a statistician and her graphic uses what are now commonly referred to as “polar diagrams.” It uses a type of pie chart to show the causes of mortality in the army, and was sent in a report to Queen Victoria in 1858.

In the 1930s, the International System of Typographic Picture Education, Isotype, was developed by the Viennese social scientist and philosopher Otto Neurath and designer Gerd Arntz as a method for visual statistics. Neurath was the founding director of the Social and Economic Museum of Vienna, which promoted the idea that “to remember simplified pictures is better than to forget accurate pictures.” Isotype symbols, some examples of which are shown opposite, have been hugely influential in the development of information graphics.

Business is no stranger to the chart and graph. But those pushing the boundaries of infographic design – normally outside the corporate world – are a multi-talented group, and are combining journalistic techniques with the visual logic of graphic design and the user-centric values of web interfaces. The results are impressive. Corporate communicators, who are often faced with the challenge of presenting complicated data to a busy audience suffering from information overload, should take note.

A good place to see the whimsical illustration of weighty matter is London-based magazine Monocle – where serious economic and global affairs journalism is often presented with hyper-stylish cartoon cuteness. Monocle Creative Director Richard Spencer Powell explains: “The balance is in part to add lightness to a magazine which is serious, to inject color and wit and express certain notions which cannot be done with photography. It’s an editorial balancing act.” On designing infographics, Spencer Powell believes that you have to have the technical skills but also a good graphic and editorial eye. “You have to be subtle, not flash. The information should be legible first and attractive second, not bombastic or distracting.”

“Advertising has long known the power of simple, visual communication. Tight concepts, strong visuals and very short copy,” says David McCandless, writer, designer and author of a psychedelic ode to the infographic, Information is Beautiful. Asked to describe what infographics are in one word, McCandless answers “portals,” suggesting a gateway through which we can access data. This is perhaps where the influence of the web becomes apparent. Infographics provide, he says, “a way of accessing the flood of information we are drowning in,” in the same way that good web apps do.

Similarly, the graphic user interface (GUI) of something like the iPhone helps people navigate a plethora of information. Monocle’s Spencer Powell continues: “Apple are the world’s best information designers. Essentially they are digital librarians. All they have ever done is make a simple humanistic way to store and display information.” A good infographic achieves something similar by applying visual navigation aids, such as proportion, form and color, to a data set. The goal is the holy grail of communications: something interesting.

Read more 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6


Edward Tufte is Professor Emeritus of Political Science, Statistics, and Computer Science at Yale University. A champion of “intense clarity” and campaigner against “pitch culture,” Tufte has been appointed by President Obama to the Recovery Independent Advisory Panel to help make the Recovery.gov initiative accessible.



back to top
  • Brunswick offices:
  • Abu Dhabi
  • Beijing
  • Berlin
  • Brussels
  • Dallas
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Hong Kong
  • Johannesburg
  • London
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • Rome
  • San Francisco

  •  
  • Sao Paulo
  • Shanghai
  • Stockholm
  • Vienna
  • Washington DC
© Copyright of Brunswick Group LLP 2012
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Accessibility
  • Site map