Brunswick 


  • About Brunswick
  • Our expertise
  • Our people
  • Insights & Brunswick Review
  • Group companies
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Contact
  • Site map
  • Home

Insights & analysis

  • Feedback
  • Surveys
  • Talking Points
  • Reports
  • Brunswick Review Issue 6
  • Brunswick Review Issue 5
  • Brunswick Review Issue 4
  • Brunswick Review Issue 3
    • Contents
    • Features
      • Standing guard for standards
      • A calculated take on trust
      • Hearing China’s voices
      • Follow the leader
      • High Fidelity
      • Custodian of a Scandinavian icon
      • Analyzing the union
      • Blogging in Brussels
      • Mobilize everything
      • After the deal
      • The cultural world after the crunch
      • Anatomy of an announcement
      • Show then share
      • Socially responsible investing pays dividends
      • Greater than the sum of its parts
    • Research
      • Digital media and the investment community
      • Trust no one
    • Different take
      • Orchestral maneuvers
      • Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
      • Devil in the detail
      • Figures of trust
      • Critical moment
  • Brunswick Review Issue 2
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
      • Climate change contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Climate perspectives
      • Introduction
      • Let's lower the curtain on the high-carbon era
      • The role of progressive states and provinces
      • China's new green
      • 20/20 vision
      • A sustainable global economy
      • Norway's route to low emissions
      • Building work
      • Time to pay up for the ecological crisis
      • A movie... not a snapshot
      • Chemical reaction
      • The long & the short of it
      • Investors as stewards
        • Dealing with the damage
      • No short cuts, please
      • Policy and the investor
      • Time to recognise forest carbon
      • The new climate for business
      • Time for a new manhattan project*
      • A fashionable future
    • Conversation & comment
      • Mark Thompson
      • Arianna Huffington
      • John Kennedy
      • Wu Xiaobo
      • Oliver Michalsky
      • Rise of the global commentariat
      • Should CEOs Twitter?
      • Mobilizing 15 million voices
      • On/off annual reporting
      • Careful, it's on the record!
    • Features
      • Why circulation is irrelevant
      • Restructuring: building the best comms model
      • A guide to guidance
        • Guidance at Unilever
      • Communicating to public & private stakeholders
      • The governance of not for profits
      • Effective board engagement with shareholders
      • What makes a great corporate affairs director?
      • Gimme shelter? Or pump up the volume?
      • Reflections of a Latin American leader
      • EU Financial Services Regulation – Moving beyond the crisis
        • An EU regulatory perspective
      • The new lobbyists
      • Tackling Beijing's M&A block
    • Research
      • Are analysts and investors engaging with new media?
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • The ties that bind
        • Corporate tie etiquette
      • Poetry
      • Leading through literature
      • What we're editing
        • The new zero
        • International book award
    • The last laugh
  • Brunswick Review Issue 1
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Q&A feature
      • Milestones
    • The big debate
      • Editor’s introduction
      • 01: Stephen Green
      • 02: Sir Win Bischoff
      • 03: Anthony Bolton
      • 04: Glenn Greenburg & Joshua Slocum
      • 05: David Faber
      • 06: John Duncan
    • Features
      • Playing happy families
      • Is there a bigger role for business in South African society?
      • One chair, many roles
      • Dubai, the reputational challenge
      • Unsolicited offers enter the mainstream
      • M&A communications in a downturn
      • A cross-cultural communications challenge
        • Media
      • The missing link
        • Checklist
      • Washington, DC 2009: The new order
      • Hard times for corporate responsibility?
        • Environmental reporting
      • When should companies apologize?
    • Research
      • But what shall we tell the staff?
      • Comply or communicate?
        • Overview of results
      • A growing role for business to forge the CR agenda
        • A diverse agenda
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • Selling the Papacy
      • The dangers of corporate kissing
      • Diary of a talent hunt
      • Tough times, straight talking
      • What we have been reading
        • Life of a European Mandarin
        • Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life
    • The last laugh

Climate perspectives

Add to download library
Add to print basket
Email this page
  • Go to download library
  • Go to print basket

Brunswick
Review
Issue two
Winter 2009

Time to pay up for the ecological crisis

Written by:
  • Jean-Louis Chaussade, Suez Environnement

In this critical time of preparation for the Copenhagen summit, I cannot resist making a parallel between the present economic crisis and the ecological one. In both cases we have been living on credit. On both fronts, the time has come to pay the debt.

Our denial of environmental costs, notably our failure to price natural resources into the economy, has brought about the climate crisis. The financial collapse was also caused by overlooking “negative externalities,” in financial reporting, balance sheet structures and risk assessment.

In both cases, we have tried to privatize profits and socialize losses.

The post-crisis society requires the emergence of a new economy, less demanding on resources, more frugal, less brutal with nature. We already see new models emerging: the “circular” economy where the waste of one industry becomes the raw material of another; the “performance” economy in which people prefer to purchase a usage rather than a product; or slim cities as opposed to slum cities, where for example water is reused in the same neighborhood.

The business model of Suez Environnement, meanwhile, is already adapting to this post-consumer society with the focus increasingly on preventing pollution rather than managing and controlling its effects. Today, the group manages the cycles of resources such as water and secondary waste products that are becoming rare. 

The new reality of climate change for the earth’s water resources is especially alarming.

Between 2008 and 2030, for example, the number of people living in countries affected by water stress will grow from 2.9bn to 3.9bn, reaching close to 50 per cent of the world’s population.

Solutions already exist and are now being developed on a large scale. Besides greater agricultural water efficiency, the saving of municipal water is a highly productive option. For example, in Casablanca where we manage the water system, the savings achieved from leak reduction are equivalent to the consumption of 800,000 inhabitants.

There is also huge potential to tap more non-conventional water sources. Only half of the 368 cubic kilometers of wastewater collected in the world each year is treated, and less than five per cent is reclaimed. Last August, we renewed a water recycling operation and maintenance contract in the Los Angeles area, a region suffering chronic droughts. Mostly reused for industrial and irrigation purposes, the treated water also replenishes groundwater reservoirs and serves as a barrier against saltwater intrusion from the Pacific Ocean.

In our waste activities, we are also pioneering new industrial models. Last July we opened a PET recycling unit, capable of recycling 40,000 tonnes of plastic bottles per year and converting them into 30,000 tonnes of recycled raw material for food packaging. This “bottle to bottle” process is one of the first of its kind in Europe.

Climate change is also a spur to innovation when it comes to reducing our own emissions. Between 2007 and 2008 Suez Environnement reduced CO2 emissions by close to ten per cent while at the same time increasing production of renewable energy by more than eight per cent. Such commitments should not be halted with the economic crisis. Quite the contrary.

Over the last 20 years businesses have made major gains in the productivity of labor and capital but until now they have neglected the productivity of resources. There are therefore many opportunities to reduce environmental impacts and simultaneously make considerable savings.

This new development model allying economic growth with environmental preoccupations calls for a new form of international governance. For this reason we cannot miss the opportunity offered in Copenhagen.

Jean-Louis Chaussade is CEO, Suez Environnement.



back to top
  • Brunswick offices:
  • Abu Dhabi
  • Beijing
  • Berlin
  • Brussels
  • Dallas
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Hong Kong
  • Johannesburg
  • London
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • Rome
  • San Francisco

  •  
  • Sao Paulo
  • Shanghai
  • Stockholm
  • Vienna
  • Washington DC
© Copyright of Brunswick Group LLP 2012
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Accessibility
  • Site map