Brunswick 


  • About Brunswick
  • Our expertise
  • Our people
  • Insights & Brunswick Review
  • Group companies
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Contact
  • Site map
  • Home

Insights & analysis

  • Feedback
  • Surveys
  • Talking Points
  • Reports
  • Brunswick Review Issue 6
  • Brunswick Review Issue 5
  • Brunswick Review Issue 4
  • Brunswick Review Issue 3
    • Contents
    • Features
      • Standing guard for standards
      • A calculated take on trust
      • Hearing China’s voices
      • Follow the leader
      • High Fidelity
      • Custodian of a Scandinavian icon
      • Analyzing the union
      • Blogging in Brussels
      • Mobilize everything
      • After the deal
      • The cultural world after the crunch
      • Anatomy of an announcement
      • Show then share
      • Socially responsible investing pays dividends
      • Greater than the sum of its parts
    • Research
      • Digital media and the investment community
      • Trust no one
    • Different take
      • Orchestral maneuvers
      • Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
      • Devil in the detail
      • Figures of trust
      • Critical moment
  • Brunswick Review Issue 2
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
      • Climate change contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Climate perspectives
      • Introduction
      • Let's lower the curtain on the high-carbon era
      • The role of progressive states and provinces
      • China's new green
      • 20/20 vision
      • A sustainable global economy
      • Norway's route to low emissions
      • Building work
      • Time to pay up for the ecological crisis
      • A movie... not a snapshot
      • Chemical reaction
      • The long & the short of it
      • Investors as stewards
        • Dealing with the damage
      • No short cuts, please
      • Policy and the investor
      • Time to recognise forest carbon
      • The new climate for business
      • Time for a new manhattan project*
      • A fashionable future
    • Conversation & comment
      • Mark Thompson
      • Arianna Huffington
      • John Kennedy
      • Wu Xiaobo
      • Oliver Michalsky
      • Rise of the global commentariat
      • Should CEOs Twitter?
      • Mobilizing 15 million voices
      • On/off annual reporting
      • Careful, it's on the record!
    • Features
      • Why circulation is irrelevant
      • Restructuring: building the best comms model
      • A guide to guidance
        • Guidance at Unilever
      • Communicating to public & private stakeholders
      • The governance of not for profits
      • Effective board engagement with shareholders
      • What makes a great corporate affairs director?
      • Gimme shelter? Or pump up the volume?
      • Reflections of a Latin American leader
      • EU Financial Services Regulation – Moving beyond the crisis
        • An EU regulatory perspective
      • The new lobbyists
      • Tackling Beijing's M&A block
    • Research
      • Are analysts and investors engaging with new media?
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • The ties that bind
        • Corporate tie etiquette
      • Poetry
      • Leading through literature
      • What we're editing
        • The new zero
        • International book award
    • The last laugh
  • Brunswick Review Issue 1
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Q&A feature
      • Milestones
    • The big debate
      • Editor’s introduction
      • 01: Stephen Green
      • 02: Sir Win Bischoff
      • 03: Anthony Bolton
      • 04: Glenn Greenburg & Joshua Slocum
      • 05: David Faber
      • 06: John Duncan
    • Features
      • Playing happy families
      • Is there a bigger role for business in South African society?
      • One chair, many roles
      • Dubai, the reputational challenge
      • Unsolicited offers enter the mainstream
      • M&A communications in a downturn
      • A cross-cultural communications challenge
        • Media
      • The missing link
        • Checklist
      • Washington, DC 2009: The new order
      • Hard times for corporate responsibility?
        • Environmental reporting
      • When should companies apologize?
    • Research
      • But what shall we tell the staff?
      • Comply or communicate?
        • Overview of results
      • A growing role for business to forge the CR agenda
        • A diverse agenda
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • Selling the Papacy
      • The dangers of corporate kissing
      • Diary of a talent hunt
      • Tough times, straight talking
      • What we have been reading
        • Life of a European Mandarin
        • Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life
    • The last laugh

Climate perspectives

Add to download library
Add to print basket
Email this page
  • Go to download library
  • Go to print basket

Brunswick
Review
Issue two
Winter 2009

The long and the short of it

Written by:
  • José Manuel Entrecanales Domecq, Acciona

When we decided to place sustainable development at the heart of Acciona’s renewable energy, civil engineering and water businesses, the financial community generally welcomed this new corporate philosophy. Yet the challenge remains how to reconcile our long-term horizons with the short-term financial returns demanded by investors.

For companies like ours, sustainability means combining economic development with social progress and environmental harmony. As leading developers and operators of renewable energy, we are involved directly in developing and building new green technologies that will help mitigate the effects of climate change.

Desalination, water treatment and recycling are other activities vital for bringing economic and social progress to the developing world while maintaining wellbeing in the rich world. Only three per cent of the water on our planet is fresh water: unless we recycle wastewater and create “new water” from the sea, two-thirds of the world’s growing population will be “water stressed” by 2025. 

All of us in this field, and (increasingly) society at large, embrace sustainability. Surprisingly, however, institutional investors – those indispensable providers of capital for the long-term development of our business model – seem less committed to its underlying principles.

The task of making ourselves understood has certainly not been made any easier by the global financial crisis and the scaling back of investment in clean energy and sustainable technologies. The crisis broke just as business models such as ours were starting to deliver good operational results. In the first quarter of 2009, investment in the renewable energy sector fell by 53 per cent compared with the same period in 2008. Investors became preoccupied with sheer survival, maintaining liquidity, and, more recently, pocketing short-term capital gains. 

Nevertheless, the flight from sustainable assets cannot be attributed solely to the global financial crisis. The main cause is the fundamental tension between the investment horizons of the financial community and those of companies such as Acciona, whose stated aim is to pursue sustainable development. By definition, the latter is measured by its long-term impact. Nothing is sustainable unless it endures over time. Sustainable projects need time to evolve, to prove themselves and to mature.

Encouraged by asset owners and pension fund consultants, investors seem compelled to place quarterly performance above sustainable, long-term returns. Investment analysts reflect this in their reports, reinforcing the pressure on companies to provide detailed quarterly guidance and then meet it with short-term returns. The long view – over ten or 15 years – may be interesting, but with few focusing beyond the next 12 months, decisions made in this longer time-frame are either penalized when they go ahead, or tend to get postponed.

How best then can we create a supportive framework that allows businesses such as ours (or others strongly focused on contributing sustainable solutions to our social needs, such as Mitsubishi, Suez, GE and Veolia) to remain true to their strategies? And how can we expect more companies to embrace the values of sustainability if their ability to think about the future is constrained by the need to generate returns in the here and now?

Recent G20 stimulus plans that contain varying levels of financial commitment to green investments are a necessary and welcome first step. But we must go beyond shock measures to revive economic growth, extend financial lifelines to banks and businesses, and generate employment. Governments have a role to play in stimulating long-term investment in sustainable businesses via the creation of incentives, such as tax exemptions for long-term focused investments. Only a pool of long-term capital will allow companies to develop the sustainable business strategies that we need to meet the needs of future generations.

José Manuel Entrecanales Domecq is Chairman of Acciona, the global infrastructure, renewable energy, water and services company based in Spain.



back to top
  • Brunswick offices:
  • Abu Dhabi
  • Beijing
  • Berlin
  • Brussels
  • Dallas
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Hong Kong
  • Johannesburg
  • London
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • Rome
  • San Francisco

  •  
  • Sao Paulo
  • Shanghai
  • Stockholm
  • Vienna
  • Washington DC
© Copyright of Brunswick Group LLP 2012
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Accessibility
  • Site map