Brunswick 


  • About Brunswick
  • Our expertise
  • Our people
  • Insights & Brunswick Review
  • Group companies
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Contact
  • Site map
  • Home

Insights & analysis

  • Feedback
  • Surveys
  • Talking Points
  • Reports
  • Brunswick Review Issue 6
  • Brunswick Review Issue 5
  • Brunswick Review Issue 4
  • Brunswick Review Issue 3
    • Contents
    • Features
      • Standing guard for standards
      • A calculated take on trust
      • Hearing China’s voices
      • Follow the leader
      • High Fidelity
      • Custodian of a Scandinavian icon
      • Analyzing the union
      • Blogging in Brussels
      • Mobilize everything
      • After the deal
      • The cultural world after the crunch
      • Anatomy of an announcement
      • Show then share
      • Socially responsible investing pays dividends
      • Greater than the sum of its parts
    • Research
      • Digital media and the investment community
      • Trust no one
    • Different take
      • Orchestral maneuvers
      • Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
      • Devil in the detail
      • Figures of trust
      • Critical moment
  • Brunswick Review Issue 2
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
      • Climate change contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Climate perspectives
      • Introduction
      • Let's lower the curtain on the high-carbon era
      • The role of progressive states and provinces
      • China's new green
      • 20/20 vision
      • A sustainable global economy
      • Norway's route to low emissions
      • Building work
      • Time to pay up for the ecological crisis
      • A movie... not a snapshot
      • Chemical reaction
      • The long & the short of it
      • Investors as stewards
        • Dealing with the damage
      • No short cuts, please
      • Policy and the investor
      • Time to recognise forest carbon
      • The new climate for business
      • Time for a new manhattan project*
      • A fashionable future
    • Conversation & comment
      • Mark Thompson
      • Arianna Huffington
      • John Kennedy
      • Wu Xiaobo
      • Oliver Michalsky
      • Rise of the global commentariat
      • Should CEOs Twitter?
      • Mobilizing 15 million voices
      • On/off annual reporting
      • Careful, it's on the record!
    • Features
      • Why circulation is irrelevant
      • Restructuring: building the best comms model
      • A guide to guidance
        • Guidance at Unilever
      • Communicating to public & private stakeholders
      • The governance of not for profits
      • Effective board engagement with shareholders
      • What makes a great corporate affairs director?
      • Gimme shelter? Or pump up the volume?
      • Reflections of a Latin American leader
      • EU Financial Services Regulation – Moving beyond the crisis
        • An EU regulatory perspective
      • The new lobbyists
      • Tackling Beijing's M&A block
    • Research
      • Are analysts and investors engaging with new media?
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • The ties that bind
        • Corporate tie etiquette
      • Poetry
      • Leading through literature
      • What we're editing
        • The new zero
        • International book award
    • The last laugh
  • Brunswick Review Issue 1
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Q&A feature
      • Milestones
    • The big debate
      • Editor’s introduction
      • 01: Stephen Green
      • 02: Sir Win Bischoff
      • 03: Anthony Bolton
      • 04: Glenn Greenburg & Joshua Slocum
      • 05: David Faber
      • 06: John Duncan
    • Features
      • Playing happy families
      • Is there a bigger role for business in South African society?
      • One chair, many roles
      • Dubai, the reputational challenge
      • Unsolicited offers enter the mainstream
      • M&A communications in a downturn
      • A cross-cultural communications challenge
        • Media
      • The missing link
        • Checklist
      • Washington, DC 2009: The new order
      • Hard times for corporate responsibility?
        • Environmental reporting
      • When should companies apologize?
    • Research
      • But what shall we tell the staff?
      • Comply or communicate?
        • Overview of results
      • A growing role for business to forge the CR agenda
        • A diverse agenda
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • Selling the Papacy
      • The dangers of corporate kissing
      • Diary of a talent hunt
      • Tough times, straight talking
      • What we have been reading
        • Life of a European Mandarin
        • Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life
    • The last laugh

Climate perspectives

Add to download library
Add to print basket
Email this page
  • Go to download library
  • Go to print basket

Brunswick
Review
Issue two
Winter 2009

Chemical reaction

Written by:
  • Jürgen Hambrecht, BASF

Climate protection? Yes please! Rarely has there been so much agreement on one issue. But when it comes to specific action – and carrying the associated costs – the mood tends to change quickly. Climate protection? No thanks – let others go first!

Such is the pattern that we have seen in the years of wrangling over an effective, globally binding agreement to combat climate change. And whether we will see movement on the various fronts at the Copenhagen Conference remains to be seen. Given the global recession, after all, getting back on track for growth is top priority.

The economic crisis, however, provides a unique opportunity to rethink and develop new concepts for both: more growth and more climate protection. Climate protection must pay off somehow, which means we have to start where it costs the least or will even save money in the foreseeable future. And we need to start now.

A key to cost-effective climate protection is right in front of us: energy efficiency. We could cut energy consumption in older buildings by an average of two-thirds right now by using modern construction and insulating materials and efficient technology for heating, cooling and lighting. Cars are another area where there are plenty of opportunities to save fuel and thus cut emissions: using lighter plastic components that reduce the weight of vehicles and hence their fuel consumption, more efficient engine technology, and hybrid vehicles with high-performance batteries. 

These are just a few examples from a very broad range of innovative products. A common feature is that all have been developed by a modern, high-performance industry – the very industry that public opinion puts at the top of the list of climate change villains. 

From a global perspective, industry standards differ greatly from region to region – and the same applies to the improvement necessary with respect to the efficient use of energy and raw materials and the reduction of emissions. In developed countries, and in Europe especially, the chemical industry is a leader in efficiency. It is also the driving force behind innovations that make efficient climate protection possible in the first place. However, the industry faces the threat of losing that innovative power if its global competitiveness is hampered by overly ambitious and one-sided climate protection requirements, for example in the implementation of the European Union emissions trading scheme. That innovative power ultimately enables the necessary technology transfer to countries that need to catch up in energy efficiency and environmental and climate protection.

The chemical industry is a driver of innovation and climate protection solutions in virtually all industries: coatings for more efficient wind turbines; materials for novel solar cells; plastics for lighter, more economical cars; components for fuel cells or high-performance batteries; the above-mentioned products for climate-compatible construction and housing. 

The extensive contribution the chemical industry makes toward more climate protection can also be seen from its global carbon footprint. A recent study published by the International Council of Chemical Associations (ICCA) showed that over their entire lifecycle, products and technologies from the chemical industry help to save more than twice the amount of climate gases emitted during their manufacture, use and disposal. 

We have to make even more effective use of this potential, now and in the future. That is why climate protection needs partnership between industry and policymakers. We need to use existing and future technologies where they make the most economic sense. For that to happen, we need fair standards for climate protection that apply worldwide. We can protect the climate and at the same time safeguard growth and prosperity only if we combine innovative technology with innovative political concepts. And the Copenhagen Conference must set the right course to achieve these goals.

Dr Jürgen Hambrecht is Chairman of the Board of Executive Directors of BASF SE.



back to top
  • Brunswick offices:
  • Abu Dhabi
  • Beijing
  • Berlin
  • Brussels
  • Dallas
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Hong Kong
  • Johannesburg
  • London
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • Rome
  • San Francisco

  •  
  • Sao Paulo
  • Shanghai
  • Stockholm
  • Vienna
  • Washington DC
© Copyright of Brunswick Group LLP 2012
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Accessibility
  • Site map