Brunswick 


  • About Brunswick
  • Our expertise
  • Our people
  • Insights & Brunswick Review
  • Group companies
  • Careers
  • Alumni
  • Contact
  • Site map
  • Home

Insights & analysis

  • Feedback
  • Surveys
  • Talking Points
  • Reports
  • Brunswick Review Issue 6
  • Brunswick Review Issue 5
  • Brunswick Review Issue 4
  • Brunswick Review Issue 3
    • Contents
    • Features
      • Standing guard for standards
      • A calculated take on trust
      • Hearing China’s voices
      • Follow the leader
      • High Fidelity
      • Custodian of a Scandinavian icon
      • Analyzing the union
      • Blogging in Brussels
      • Mobilize everything
      • After the deal
      • The cultural world after the crunch
      • Anatomy of an announcement
      • Show then share
      • Socially responsible investing pays dividends
      • Greater than the sum of its parts
    • Research
      • Digital media and the investment community
      • Trust no one
    • Different take
      • Orchestral maneuvers
      • Float like a butterfly, sting like a bee
      • Devil in the detail
      • Figures of trust
      • Critical moment
  • Brunswick Review Issue 2
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
      • Climate change contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Climate perspectives
      • Introduction
      • Let's lower the curtain on the high-carbon era
      • The role of progressive states and provinces
      • China's new green
      • 20/20 vision
      • A sustainable global economy
      • Norway's route to low emissions
      • Building work
      • Time to pay up for the ecological crisis
      • A movie... not a snapshot
      • Chemical reaction
      • The long & the short of it
      • Investors as stewards
        • Dealing with the damage
      • No short cuts, please
      • Policy and the investor
      • Time to recognise forest carbon
      • The new climate for business
      • Time for a new manhattan project*
      • A fashionable future
    • Conversation & comment
      • Mark Thompson
      • Arianna Huffington
      • John Kennedy
      • Wu Xiaobo
      • Oliver Michalsky
      • Rise of the global commentariat
      • Should CEOs Twitter?
      • Mobilizing 15 million voices
      • On/off annual reporting
      • Careful, it's on the record!
    • Features
      • Why circulation is irrelevant
      • Restructuring: building the best comms model
      • A guide to guidance
        • Guidance at Unilever
      • Communicating to public & private stakeholders
      • The governance of not for profits
      • Effective board engagement with shareholders
      • What makes a great corporate affairs director?
      • Gimme shelter? Or pump up the volume?
      • Reflections of a Latin American leader
      • EU Financial Services Regulation – Moving beyond the crisis
        • An EU regulatory perspective
      • The new lobbyists
      • Tackling Beijing's M&A block
    • Research
      • Are analysts and investors engaging with new media?
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • The ties that bind
        • Corporate tie etiquette
      • Poetry
      • Leading through literature
      • What we're editing
        • The new zero
        • International book award
    • The last laugh
  • Brunswick Review Issue 1
    • Contents
    • Chairman’s letter
    • Guest contributors
    • Brunswick feature writers
    • Q&A feature
      • Milestones
    • The big debate
      • Editor’s introduction
      • 01: Stephen Green
      • 02: Sir Win Bischoff
      • 03: Anthony Bolton
      • 04: Glenn Greenburg & Joshua Slocum
      • 05: David Faber
      • 06: John Duncan
    • Features
      • Playing happy families
      • Is there a bigger role for business in South African society?
      • One chair, many roles
      • Dubai, the reputational challenge
      • Unsolicited offers enter the mainstream
      • M&A communications in a downturn
      • A cross-cultural communications challenge
        • Media
      • The missing link
        • Checklist
      • Washington, DC 2009: The new order
      • Hard times for corporate responsibility?
        • Environmental reporting
      • When should companies apologize?
    • Research
      • But what shall we tell the staff?
      • Comply or communicate?
        • Overview of results
      • A growing role for business to forge the CR agenda
        • A diverse agenda
    • Art profile
    • Different take
      • Selling the Papacy
      • The dangers of corporate kissing
      • Diary of a talent hunt
      • Tough times, straight talking
      • What we have been reading
        • Life of a European Mandarin
        • Snowball: Warren Buffett and the business of life
    • The last laugh

The big debate

Add to download library
Add to print basket
Email this page
  • Go to download library
  • Go to print basket

Brunswick
Review
Issue one
Spring 2009

03: Anthony Bolton

President, Investment, Fidelity International

Looking ahead to the next 12 months, I think the governance agenda will be increasingly important. In a bull market, when things are going well, it is relatively easy to identify a poorly performing company in a sector where everyone else is prospering: it is not hard to suggest that management may not be up to the task and that changes should be looked at. In a contracting economy, where all companies are suffering, it is less clear when bad management is to blame. 

Inevitably, with share prices down and options out of the money, incentives have become a controversial area. We are certainly looking at all our approaches to remuneration. We are normally pretty strongly opposed to the re-pricing of options but I do think one has to guard against knee jerk reactions which may lead to a situation where the only way to get decent incentives is to change the management. There is no question that in many cases remuneration policy has been focused too much on the short-term and I think we’re likely to see both a longer performance vesting period (during which executives will have to wait for the award of shares) and a further mandatory period of time when managers will have to hold on to incentive stock. Personally I am not in favor of claw backs (the proposal that would see executives handing back their rewards retrospectively if they were perceived to have failed). Imposing too many conditions risks stifling innovation and personal motivation because people start seeing the rewards as academic and something they are never going to be able to get their hands on.

There is a minority view in the European Union – but a meaningful one – that everyone should go back to fixed salaries and variable pay should be minimal. I totally disagree with that as a shareholder because appropriate motivation is an important way of getting the outcomes we all want. I have no problem with a high variable remuneration structure provided that it is symmetrical – in that if success is well-rewarded, failure should not be. Companies are going to have to think carefully about how to communicate this issue, just as they are about everything else.

Read more 1 | 2 | 3

Anthony Bolton is President, Investment, at Fidelity International. His Fidelity Special Situations fund has been the top performer in its sector since its launch in 1979. He was manager of the fund for more than 27 years and now has a full-time role mentoring Fidelity’s younger fund managers and overseeing Fidelity’s investment process.



back to top
  • Brunswick offices:
  • Abu Dhabi
  • Beijing
  • Berlin
  • Brussels
  • Dallas
  • Dubai
  • Frankfurt
  • Hong Kong
  • Johannesburg
  • London
  • Milan
  • Munich
  • New York
  • Paris
  • Rome
  • San Francisco

  •  
  • Sao Paulo
  • Shanghai
  • Stockholm
  • Vienna
  • Washington DC
© Copyright of Brunswick Group LLP 2012
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Agreement
  • Accessibility
  • Site map